Details

    • Type: Problem Report
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects versions: None
    • Fix versions: None
    • Components: Base Types
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The syntax for version-ids in http://openehr.org/releases/BASE/latest/docs/base_types/base_types.html#_syntaxes

      may have some issues:

      version-id = 'v', non-zero-digit, [ number ] ;
      [...]
      number = digit, { digit } ;
      [...]
      digit = '0' | nz_digit ;
      non-zero-digit = '1' | .. | '9' ;


      Problems:

      1. version-id seems to disallow v0 ? I think this needs to be allowed? But in a way that 0 is only allowed directly after v if no other digit follows: You MUST NOT be able to construct v01 or v001 or v0001, etc

      2. nz_digit = non-zero-digit ? Otherwise nz_digit is not defined

      3. Generally in that section, there are some production rules where the EBNF doens't include commas between the individual terminals and non-terminals, e.g. object_version_id or archetype_id. There may be a reason for that I don't understand, but it seems to me like a mixture of using commas and not to indicate a concatentation is used? I think if you assume implicit concatenation of adjacent symbols (i.e. without using a comma) then it should be done consistently.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              sebastian.garde Sebastian Garde
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated: