Details

      Description

      I have the impression PARTY class got a new 'redefine' of uid attribute somewhere between v1.0.0 and v1.0.1. Previously was addressed or touched in SPEC-194.

      The only thing that mentions something about uid (indirectly) is the following text from section https://www.openehr.org/releases/RM/Release-1.0.2/docs/demographic/demographic.html#_party_identification:
      "Identifiers of Party instances in the system are provided in the same way as identifiers of Compositions in the EHR: via the uid attribute (type OBJECT_VERSION_ID) of the containing VERSION. "

      If I'm not mistaken this is just an export problem of UML, than propagated to specs.

      I think the correct type is the one that inherits from LOCATABLE (so UID_BASED_ID). I'm not sure though if this attribute should be required or not, overriding optional state from LOCATABLE. At least Code24 always implemented this as specified in from LOCATABLE.

        Attachments

          Issue links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                Thomas Beale
                Reporter:
                Sebastian Iancu
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: