Add details: ITEM_STRUCTURE to FOLDER.
I’d suggest keeping the change to a minimum and initially going with an ITEM_STRUCTURE description. I am a bit worried about FOLDER turning into an escape hatch into NOSQL equivalent of RM, duplicating modelling semantics which are meant to be represented elsewhere in the RM and already have means in place. I’m referring to start_time/end_time type of attributes.
I think it’d be best if we explored which use cases we can/should handle with an ITEM_STRUCTURE first, then consider extending FOLDER further, if necessary.
Not sure what you mean - the change is just to add details: ITEM_STRUCTURE to FOLDER...
I’m referring to comments above from that suggests adding start_time etc and actually attempting to agree with you. Ignore my reference to NOSQL etc, I think this CR is OK, sorry about the confusion.
if you are ok with the changes made (see commits, or follow links in the Change Description), can you add yourself to the acceptance (right hand side)?
thanks, did not realise we could do that. done.