...
Due to archetyping the model is could actually be allowed to be simpler than the 1.0.2 spec is without losing any significant expressiveness. The intention is primarily to make learning and usage simpler for archetype authors, but hopefully also for implementers. Below is an initial suggestion based on some previous mail threads
- http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-clinical/msg01353.html, Mar 2009, Confusing naming of OBSERVATION and EVALUATION?
- http://www.openehr..
...
- org/mailarchives/openehr-technical/msg05299.html, Nov 2010, openEHR-13606 harmonization CR regarding CLUSTER/TABLE etc and ENTRY/OBSERVATION
Changes
See comments in diagram.
...