Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • accelerate rate of review of existing v0 international archetypes

  • democratise & scale modelling effort, and organise, probably via Work Groups;

    • reduce editorial and other bottle-necks slowing down archetype production

    • better outreach:

      • Calling for more clinical modellers and health professionals to join the community during the discussions, trying to cover most of the specialties

      • try to reduce archetype silos forming in vendors - try to facilitate re-use as much as possible

    • strategies to obtain funding and resource-in-kind

    • use Affiliates to help scale clinical requirements gathering, modelling and dissemination

  • investigate other CKMs / vendor archetype silos for merge, reuse etc

Governance

  • review intellectual property (IP) safety/risk of archetypes, particularly scores, scales, terminology bindings

  • good integration with other openEHR Programs (Specification, Software, and Education) to work together and discuss issues in periodic meetings.

  • Priority integration with Educational program to capacitate more people to work with openEHR standards, help create modelling training materials etc

  • Creation of working groups (WGs) based on individual's expertise and projects e.g. cardiology, pediatrics, PROMS, scores, ...

  • more transparent project definition and management

  • Establishment of a governance team to maintain CKM quality

...