Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

Thilo Schuler: Value sets (fixed or dynamic) may be a useful name for terminology bindings.
[A worked example|Terminology and value sets] of binding SNOMED subset to an archetype and a template is now available.

Term binding

Term binding is an ADL construct used to associate a language-independent string-label (e.g. at0005) with a specific term from a specific terminology. This allows for the name of a data point or Archetype node (as distinct from the corresponding value) to be identified as being the same as a specific term in a terminology. This, in turn, has the potential attraction of allowing language translations through the terminology, where they have not been done explicitly in the Archetype.

...

The relationship between SNOMED and Archetypes is important in building semantic interoperability in health care. However it is critical that we do not bind terms inappropriately to nodes in archetypes that have unambiguous meanings which are not yet represented in the correct part of the SNOMED hierarchy. This will be tempting in the name of expediency. But to do so will do more harm than good.

 Addendum

Sam Heard, July 2008

One issue that we probably should address in this document is that the 'binding' to terminology addressed here (and called semantic tagging) is just that. It is at present a tag of a code from a terminology to aid in determination of the meaning if it is ambiguous. On further reflection in discussions with Eric Browne, I wonder if this relationship should always be "Records" as an archetype is a structure for recording information about things in the world. This archetype records that. This might help us with the ambiguity that arises when trying to semantically tag the blood pressure archetype. I have retrieved the terms that have an IS_A relationship with 'Blood pressure (observable entity)' as one would expect that we could say:

openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.blood_pressure.v1 _records_ "Blood pressure (observable entity)", SNOMED-CT, 75367002
In fact this is not so ,as the blood pressure archetype does not record all of the children of blood pressure:

Term

Recorded using blood pressure archetype

Note

24 hour blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

The time series will allow this

Arterial blood pressure (observable entity)

?

It is really systemic arterial, local should use intravascular pressure

Arterial pulse pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Core data element

Arterial wedge pressure (observable entity)

No

I do not think this is ever used for systemic arterial

Diastolic blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Core data element

Invasive blood pressure (observable entity)

?

Is this the site of measurement? Not when someone is invading?

Lying blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Position at the time of measurement

Mean blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Mean Arterial pressure (per cycle) and average blood pressure over a period of time

Post-vasodilatation arterial pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Need a state model to cover this

Segmental pressure (blood pressure) (observable entity)

No

To measure limb pressure and covered by intravascular pressure

Sitting blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Position at the time of measurement

Standing blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Position at the time of measurement

Systemic blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

This is what the archetype measures in the broadest sense

Systolic blood pressure (observable entity)

Yes

Core data element

Venous pressure (observable entity)

No

Covered by intravascular pressure measurement

Comparison with the mindmap image of the archetype might be helpful:
Image Added

In conclusion, there is much work to be done to maximise the benefit from a close association between the data structures to be shared, the terminology that provides the content for these structures (value sets) and the semantic links with the data points themselves (semantic tagging). Forging a strong working relationship between the IHTSDO and the openEHR Foundation will assist greatly in this process.

References

David Markwell's work for UK NHS CFH program

...