Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

We model health care delivery as two kinds of process: a clinical process, corresponding to the interaction between a 'clinical investigator system' and a 'patient system', situated within a business process, which is owned by an 'administrative context'. The clinical process constitutes a sub-process of the business process, i.e. it is the main mechanism for the business process to achieve its goal, which is to satisfy a demand for care on the part of the patient. The administrative context corresponds to the health system as a whole, rather than a single enterprise, since from the patient care point of view, the mobilisation of care delivery is carried out by a network of provider organisations. The model can be illustrated in two equivalent ways, as shown in Figure 3.

The terms 'observation', 'evaluation' etc defined above are not themselves the same as information types, since they refer to a variety of phenomena within the process: information from observations, the activity of evaluation, acts of intervention, and goal statements. To be more precise, we are mainly interested in information created by the investigator system, since this notional agent encompasses any person or device who/which performs any healthcare related task, including the patient herself. The investigator system is therefore the creator of all clinical information in the health record, including patient-entered data. A small amount of administrative information may also end up in the EHR, generally created by non-clinical actors in the organisational context.
We can redraw the investigator system in order to more clearly show the types of information created during the care process, as shown in Figure 4. Five types of information are identified, as follows:

  • observation: information created by an act of observation, measurement, questioning, or testing of the patient or related substance (tissue, urine etc), including by the patient himself (e.g. taking own blood glucose measurement), in short, the entire stream of information captured by the investigator, used to characterise the patient system;
  • opinion: thoughts of the investigator about what the observations mean, and what to do about them, created during the evaluation activity, including all diagnoses, assessments, speculative plans, goals;
  • instruction: opinion-based instructions sufficiently detailed so as to be directly executable by investigator agents (people or machines), in order to effect a desired intervention (including obtaining a sample for further investigation, as in a biopsy);
  • action: a record of intervention actions that have occurred, due to instructions or otherwise;
  • administrative event: a record of a business event occurring within the administrative context, such as admission, booking, referral, discharge etc.

The Clinical Investigator Record (CIR) ontology:
An ontology of types of recorded health information. This ontology is probabaly the main starting point for analysing the ontological qualities of openEHR.

...

To be continued

References

  1. Anchor
    Rector1991
    Rector1991

...

  1. Rector A L, Nowlan W A, Kay S. Foundations for an Electronic Medical Record. Methods of Information in Medicine, 1991, 30:179-186. citeseer
  2. Anchor
    Austin1962
    Austin1962

...

  1. Austin JL. How to Do Things With Words. Cambridge (Mass.) 1962 - Paperback: Harvard University Press, 2nd edition, 2005. amazon
  2. Anchor
    hl7org
    hl7org

...

  1. HL7 International. Reference Information Model (RIM). See http://www.hl7.org.
  2. Anchor
    weed1968
    weed1968

...

  1. Weed LL. Medical Records, Medical Education and Patient Care. The Problem Oriented Medical Record as a Basic Tool. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University press, 1968. google scholar amazon
  2. Anchor
    Elstein1978
    Elstein1978

...

  1. Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1978. amazon
  2. Anchor
    Tange2003
    Tange2003

...

  1. Tange HJ, Dietz JLG, Hasman A, de Vries Robbé PF. A Generic Model of Clinical Practice - A Common View of Individual and Collaborative Care. Methods of Information in Medicine 3/2003. Schattauer GmbH. complete article
  2. Anchor
    Bruun2005
    Bruun2005

...

  1. Bruun-Rasmussen M, Bernstein K, Vingtoft S, Nøhr C, Andersen SK. Quality labelling and certification of Electronic Health Record Systems. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2005; 116: p47-52. pubmed
  2. Anchor
    Areblad2005
    Areblad2005

...

  1. Areblad M, Fogelberg M, Karlsson D, Åhlfeldt H. SAMBA - Structured Architecture for Medical Business Activities. In: Engelbrecht R, et al. (editors) Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio-Informatics. MIE 2005: Proceedings of Medical Informatics Europe; 2005 Aug 28-31; Geneva, Switzerland. p. 1225-30.
  2. Anchor
    Beale2000
    Beale2000

...

  1. Beale T, Heard S. The GEHR Object Model - Technical Requirements. 2000. complete document.
  2. Anchor
    Riche1992
    Riche1992

...

  1. RICHE Consortium. RICHE ESPRIT Project. Final Report. Nov 30 1992.
  2. Anchor
    Ingram1995
    Ingram1995

...

  1. Ingram D, Lloyd D, Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S, Grubb, P, Dixon R, Camplin D, Ellis J, Maskens A. Deliverable 19,20,24: GEHR Architecture. GEHR Project 30/6/1995. complete document.
  2. Anchor
    Grenon2004
    Grenon2004

...

  1. Pierre GRENON, Barry SMITH and Louis GOLDBERG. Biodynamic Ontology: Applying BFO in the Biomedical Domain. From D. M. Pisanelli (ed.), Ontologies in Medicine, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2004, 20-38. complete article
  2. Anchor
    Beale2007
    Beale2007

...

  1. Thomas Beale, Sam Heard. An Ontology-based Model of Clinical Information. pp760-764 Proceedings MedInfo 2007, K. Kuhn et al. (Eds), IOS Publishing 2007.