2016-04-28 SEC Call notes

Date

Apr 28, 2016

Attendees

@Thomas Beale
@Sebastian Iancu
@Bjørn Næss
@Pablo Pazos
@Erik Sundvall

Goals

Close off some items from previous call.

Discussion items

Time	Item	Who	Notes

Time	Item	Who	Notes
15 min	Review actions items last call	@Thomas Beale
30 min	Review RM 1.0.4 items		SPECRM-49 - being fixed.
15 min	Terminology progress	@Ian McNicoll	Refer to Pablo re: XML format; see older discussion.
10 min	AM rules	@Thomas Beale	See ADL2 rules section; AOM2 rules section.
	Workflow related	@Bjørn Næss	Psy committal workflow - ref @Bjørn Næss
	Archetype modeling issues		There is a SEC worry about CKM archetyping work that avoids specializations. Is it due to old ADL1.4 tooling or other reasons? What are the consequenses for AQL querying? Is it important time to fix this properly now during "industry sprint" before too much data is stored in ways that make querying harder? Care plan: Having everything in a big persistent composition does has been shown to be impractical/problematic in several use cases seen by both DIPS and Code24. In a norwegian context it might even be illegal - forcing every actor changing something to sign the entire plan.
	ACTIVITY and ACTION		@Erik Sundvall asked about how INSTRUCTION+ACTIVITY+ACTION is usually modelled/connected in GUIs. Are there helpful tools like form builders or do you need to write code? @Bjørn Næss demoed ACTION → ACTIVITY bindings in DIPS. We probably need to publish more examples showing use in runtime systems if we want different implementers to do things in similar ways.

Action items

@Thomas Beale - ask ABD group to publish some material

@Thomas Beale - Consider planning a joint workshop with implementers and archetype authors (including at least Clinical Programme leads+SEC?) - addressing best practice use of openEHR Instruction and related structures for workflow, care plan use cases.