We're updating the issue view to help you get more done. 

PARTY.reverse_relationships should better be a Set<PARTY_REF> ?

Description

Would that be better if PARTY.reverse_relationships would be a Set<PARTY_REF> instead of Set<LOCATABLE_REF> ?
Relationships as defined in specifications are always going to be between PARTY objects; furthermore 'path' property of LOCATABLE_REF will never be used in this context.
In the reverse_relationship case the actual kind of reference should be via the use of OBJECT_VERSION_IDs to denote the exact Version of the source PARTY, rather than HIER_OBJECT_IDs.

Environment

None

Status

Reporter

Sebastian Iancu

Labels

None

Components

Affects versions

RM Release 1.0.3

Priority

Minor