Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeTopicWhoNotesPresentations, Outcomes
Tue 16 Sep
09:00

Intro - scene setting

Meeting goals

Priorities

2 mins from anyone on the floor

facilitator: T Beale

 

TB opening remarks slides PDF.

Original TB blog post on key criteria.

Priorities mentioned during introductions:

  • Entry level openEHR - getting started is too hard
  • Deal with licensing FUD
  • Support for localisation, affiliate groups
10:30--------- COFFEE ----------   
10:45The Foundation

Ian McNicoll
Tomaz Gornik 

 

Ian McNicoll presentation on new board structure.

Questions raised:

  • articles of association / statutes / by-laws - where defined? Gunnar Klein
  • registering trademark outside of Europe
  • what is UCL's role? Why not independently registered as a company? Does UCL need to be involved?
  • Erik Sundvall: need to be able to fork specifications; requires different license.

Actions:

  • Gunnar K offered to help with draft & review of statutes etc
  • Text of membership page needs to be changed to reflect 15€ membership idea. Ian M / Adriana
  • General feeling is to change org diagram so that 'second board' is a management committee including program leads
11:15

HANDI / NHS

all 

Ian McNicoll presentation on HANDI-HOPD

Demo platform being managed by HANDI, not NHS

Already involving some European companies

Questions:

  • How do we make the openEHR engagement more active and visible?
12:00----------------- LUNCH ------------------------   
13:00

Conformance, APIs

openEHR inVivo

fac: Tomaz
Borut, everyone

Decisions needed:

  • rough definition of conformance specifications to create

Tomaz intro:

  • IHE approach - publicly announce compliance profiles; required to go to connectathon and demonstrate interop with 2 or more other products; monitors give certification.

detailed notes here.

13:30Vendor model of Cooperation & Collaboration & CompetitionTomaz Gornik,
Ian McNicoll
 (deferred)
14:00Specifications governance & toolingT Beale

Decisions needed:

  • conversion of specifications from FrameMaker to alternative format, e.g. AsciiDoc, DITA...
  • agree lightweight change process

TB explained current status quo of releases and tooling.

Actions:

  • review specifications governance - TB, Erik Sundvall, Gunnar Klein
  • review Asciidoc as possible new toolchain - Bostjan, Fabio, TB
  • provide a tooling and specifications roadmap overview (S From, DIPS)
14:45GDL & CDS updateRong

Decisions needed:

  • GDL needs to become a proper specification
Rong & Iago presentation on GDL and new features.
15:00----- coffee ------   
15:15Incorporating new specifications - GDL & AQLRong,
All
 TB: GDL can be first spec in Asciidoc tool chain approach
16:15FHIR + SMART - specification / compliance   
16:30

Archetype tooling and ADL 1.5

  • Archetype editor, Template designer
  • EhrExplorer

T Beale
Borut Fabjan
Rong
... 

Decisions needed:

  • what version to rename ADL 1.5 to, since it is now no longer directly compatible with ADL 1.4
  • what approach to migrating from ADL 1.4 to ADL 1.x .... 2.*
 
Wed 17 Sep
09:00

Clinical modelling

  • development sprint
  • editorial team
  • model of sharing, versioning

 

fac: Ian

Heather

Tomaz

 

Decisions needed:

  • agreement on mode of action on 'industry sprint'

See this wiki page for main description.

Candidate archetype list.

Heather:

  • about 30 / 30 / 30% easy / medium / hard
  • need to have industry partners involvement to the extent of reviewing to-be-published archetypes for their use (i.e. for implementation).
  • publishing - important PR exercise

It was agreed that some new editors will come on board for the sprint.

It was stated that full terminology bindings would be developed in a following phase; however epSOS terminology coverage will be reviewed during the exercise.

Main terminology bindings would better be done by IHTSDO involvement with CIMI. Potential contacts - Daniel Karlsson, Linda Bird.

Possible synchronisation with Norway archetype development; contact Silje

09:30

Clinical model sharing issues across CKMs

openEHR CKM status

fac: Ian

 

Erik/ Ian M: we can potentially use Git-style methods to mechanically implement the fork / pull request lifecycle.

Heather: right now, Change Request mechanism being added to CKM in next release.

Question: how to submit a new archetype from a national program that doesn't exist in CKM yet.

Martin vd Meer: need better documentation on how to do clinical modelling.

10:15------- coffee -------   
10:30

National updates

  • Sweden
  • Norway experience, methodology
  • Japan

Erik S

Silje

Shinji

  
11:00InfrastructureDIPS, Borut, T Beale

Decisions needed:

  • need to fund dedicated openEHR.org server, allowing multiple sub-domain websites, Jira, etc
  • need to agree on sysadmin responsibility
 
11:30

Web / e-presence

  • solicit requirements
  • web site ideas
  • educational materials
  • entry points

fac: TB

Heather

Adriana Danilakova

all

  
12:00------------------------- LUNCH ------------------------   
13:00

FHIR + SMART, IHE - technical, EN ISO 13606

  • DIPS & FHIR 10 mins
  • Marand update 10 mins
  • IHE - Marand
  • T Beale - archetype-based approach 10 mins

T Beale
Borut Fabjan
DIPS 

Decisions needed:

  • openEHR approach to FHIR
  • openEHR and IHE
  • openEHR and EN ISO 13606
 
14:00Localisation

fac: Ian M

Shinji

  
14:30ADL & tooling discussion continuedfac: TB  
15:00Wrap up - road ahead, agreementsIan McNicoll,
Tomaz Gornik
  
16:00=============== END ================   

...