Time | Topic | Who | Notes | Presentations, Outcomes |
---|
Tuesday 16 September |
09:00 | Intro - scene setting Meeting goals Priorities 2 mins from anyone on the floor | facilitator: T Beale | | TB opening remarks slides PDF. Original TB blog post on key criteria. Priorities mentioned during introductions: - Entry level openEHR - getting started is too hard
- Deal with licensing FUD
- Support for localisation, affiliate groups
|
10:30 | --------- COFFEE ---------- | | | |
10:45 | The Foundation | Ian McNicoll Tomaz Gornik | | Ian McNicoll presentation on new board structure. Questions raised: - articles of association / statutes / by-laws - where defined? Gunnar Klein
- registering trademark outside of Europe
- what is UCL's role? Why not independently registered as a company? Does UCL need to be involved?
- Erik Sundvall: need to be able to fork specifications; requires different license.
Actions: - Gunnar K offered to help with draft & review of statutes etc
- Text of membership page needs to be changed to reflect 15€ membership idea. Ian M / Adriana
- General feeling is to change org diagram so that 'second board' is a management committee including program leads
|
11:15 | HANDI / NHS | all | | Ian McNicoll presentation on HANDI-HOPD Demo platform being managed by HANDI, not NHS Already involving some European companies Questions: - How do we make the openEHR engagement more active and visible?
|
12:00 | ------------ LUNCH -------------- | | | |
13:00 | Conformance, APIs openEHR inVivo | fac: Tomaz Borut, everyone | Decisions needed: - rough definition of conformance specifications to create
| Tomaz intro: - IHE approach - publicly announce compliance profiles; required to go to connectathon and demonstrate interop with 2 or more other products; monitors give certification.
detailed notes here. |
13:30 | Vendor model of Cooperation & Collaboration & Competition | Tomaz Gornik, Ian McNicoll | | (deferred) |
14:00 | Specifications governance & tooling | T Beale | Decisions needed: - conversion of specifications from FrameMaker to alternative format, e.g. AsciiDoc, DITA...
- agree lightweight change process
| TB explained current status quo of releases and tooling. Actions: - review specifications governance - TB, Erik Sundvall, Gunnar Klein
- agreed Asciidoc as candidate new doc toolchain - Bostjan, Fabio, TB
- provide a tooling and specifications roadmap overview (S From, DIPS)
Questions: - how to move to tool-based UML, integrated with documentation?
- tool-based class definition tables? Obtainable from UML tool?
|
14:45 | GDL & CDS update | Rong | Decisions needed: - GDL needs to become a proper specification
| Rong & Iago presentation on GDL and new features. |
15:00 | ----- coffee ------ | | | |
15:15 | Incorporating new specifications - GDL & AQL | Rong, All | | TB: GDL can be first spec in Asciidoc tool chain approach |
16:30 | Archetype tooling and ADL 1.5 - Archetype editor, Template designer
- EhrExplorer
| T Beale Borut Fabjan Rong ... | Decisions needed: - what version to rename ADL 1.5 to, since it is now no longer directly compatible with ADL 1.4
- what approach to migrating from ADL 1.4 to ADL 1.x .... 2.*
| Actions: - agreed to rename current ADL 1.5 spec to 2.x
- agreed in principle on a community tooling project in Java / js / web UI
|
Wednesday 17 September |
09:00 | Clinical modelling - development sprint
- editorial team
- model of sharing, versioning
| fac: Ian Heather Tomaz | Decisions needed: - agreement on mode of action on 'industry sprint'
| See this wiki page for main description. Candidate archetype list. Heather: - about 30 / 30 / 30% easy / medium / hard
- need to have industry partners involvement to the extent of reviewing to-be-published archetypes for their use (i.e. for implementation).
- publishing - important PR exercise
Agreements - It was agreed that some new editors will come on board for the sprint.
- It was stated that full terminology bindings would be developed in a following phase; however epSOS terminology coverage will be reviewed during the exercise.
- need to include some example data for each? archetype
Main terminology bindings would better be done by IHTSDO involvement with CIMI. Potential contacts - Daniel Karlsson, Linda Bird. Possible synchronisation with Norway archetype development; contact Silje |
09:30 | Clinical model sharing issues across CKMs openEHR CKM status | fac: Ian | | Erik/ Ian M: we can potentially use Git-style methods to mechanically implement the fork / pull request lifecycle. Heather: right now, Change Request mechanism being added to CKM in next release. Question: how to submit a new archetype from a national program that doesn't exist in CKM yet. Martin vd Meer: need better documentation on how to do clinical modelling. Ian: could even use Stackoverflow. |
10:15 | ------- coffee ------- | | | |
10:30 | National openEHR updates - Sweden
- Norway experience, methodology
- Japan
- Spain / 13606
- Australia
- UK - NHS/FHIR
| Erik S Silje Shinji David Moner Hugh Leslie Ian | | Norway (Silje): Sweden (Erik Sundvall) - some previous experiments with openEHR not very successful
- Cambio COSMIC 8.1 will include archetypes; 8.2 - 'archetypes for real'
- ~1m population coverage of council orgs will use this
- 2 council archetype modellers attended clinical modelling course.
- demos underway to get funding for long term activity
- Gunnar: SKL doing some activity again; official activity mostly unknown due to new govt.
Brazil / Sweden (Erik Sundvall) - Sergio Freire - guest Post-doc in Sweden 2013. Large epidemiology DB published in brazil - Sergio devised archetypes and method to convert data to openEHR for clinical querying.
Japan (Shinji) - Seminars every 2 - 3 months; including vendor attendees
- 2 national projects: Medical Markup Language - being applied / re-engineered using archetypes.
- Ruby implementation
Asia: - ASEAN unification program starts 2015 - opportunities in health information network.
- Huge advantage - mostly green field technology wise
Australia & NZ (Heather Leslie) - Nehta using CKM for 3-4y to generate their models underlying CDA and other end-use (non-openEHR) PCEHR artefacts; PCEHR development now on hold
- Archetypes are basis for PCEHR messages from GP systems.
- Northern Territory now main user and driver of modelling, due to indigenous health needs. Using an atomised openEHR data repository.
- Remote clinical mentoring by Ocean of NT clinicians
- Nehta archetypes being used natively in Ocean openEHR solutions
Spain / 13606 (David Moner) - slides PPT
- main gov priority - interop / data sharing between 17 regions
- 10 clinical documents defined by MOH in form of 13606 archetypes
- MOH review of archetypes currently underway
UK (Ian McNicoll) |
11:00 | Infrastructure | DIPS, Borut, T Beale | Decisions needed: - need to fund dedicated openEHR.org server, allowing multiple sub-domain websites, Jira, etc
- need to agree on sysadmin responsibility
| |
11:30 | Web / e-presence - solicit requirements
- web site ideas
- educational materials
- entry points
| fac: TB Heather Adriana Danilakova all | | |
12:00 | ------------------------- LUNCH ------------------------ | | | |
13:00 | FHIR + SMART, IHE - technical, EN ISO 13606 - DIPS & FHIR 10 mins
- Marand update 10 mins
- IHE - Marand
- T Beale - archetype-based approach 10 mins
| T Beale Borut Fabjan DIPS | Decisions needed: - openEHR approach to FHIR
- openEHR and IHE
- openEHR and EN ISO 13606
| |
14:00 | Localisation | fac: Ian M Shinji | | |
14:30 | ADL & tooling discussion continued | fac: TB | | |
15:00 | Wrap up - road ahead, agreements | Ian McNicoll, Tomaz Gornik | | |
16:00 | =============== END ================ | | | |