Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

PRStatusDescriptionVOTE TO
PROGRESS 
PriorityPROPOSED ACTION

SPECPR-11

DEFER Need to specify a choice of different objects within a container attribute in Archetype and Template  

Group construct - put off till AOM 2.1

SPECPR-24DEFERImproving Translation details and other_contributorsTB Create CR, even though exact details not yet worked out

SPECPR-41

SPECPR-62

SPECPR-119

 

Enable content specific flavours of null to be specified per archetype

Add a 'reason for null' text attribute in the Reference model

CLUSTER also needs a Null_flavour

 MAJOR

Flavours of Null PRs

REQUIRES DISCUSSION

SPECPR-43

DEFERMinor problem in Iso8601DateTime pattern defintion in XML-Schema  check with SI/Code24 and also Heath/Ocean

SPECPR-70

 Simplify modelling of 'CodedWithExtensions' CWE pattern of DV_CODED_TEXT by addition of an 'unbounded' qualifier to defining_code constraint MAJOR

REQUIRES DISCUSSION

The CWE question

SPECPR-73

SPECPR-74

SPECPR-106

 These are all to do with simplifying the 'lower model' of the RM (ITEM_XXX classes)KAMAJOR

REQUIRES DISCUSSION

Designate one as the main PR, close and reference the two
others, and create a single CR in the RM component (exact
change unknown so far)

SPECPR-91

 Add sibling_id to LOCATABLE so that child objects can be uniquely identified without relying on the name field MAJORREQUIRES DISCUSSION

SPECPR-94

 AOM node_id optionality rules not clear  propose: raise CR to rectify invariant to be optional in ADL 1.5; then in ADL 1.6 or ADL 1.7, bring in mandatory node_ids as per ADL 2

SPECPR-95

 language on multiple locations contain invalid ISO 639-1 codesTB propose to raise CR that fixes documentation.

SPECPR-98

 Definition of DV_ENCAPSULATED is incorrect (SIZE missing)SIminor 

SPECPR-99

 AUDIT_DETAILS.system_id‏ semantics not well defined minorREQUIRES DISCUSSION

SPECPR-101

 Relax the rule that demands uniqueness of DV_ORDINAL value minorREQUIRES DISCUSSION - IAN

SPECPR-103

 Add instance level annotations capability to RM MAJOR

REQUIRES DISCUSSION

TB: This is a variation on a common request; my view is that it has to be done with referencing and that doing it properly requires new RM.

SPECPR-104

 PARTY.reverse_relationships should better be a Set<PARTY_REF> ? minorREQUIRES DISCUSSION

SPECPR-105

 VERSION commit in XML minor?REQUIRES DISCUSSION (Pablo)
SPECPR-106 (see SPECPR-73)   

SPECPR-107

 

Allow creating LINK archetypes to specify queryable links between concepts

 MAJOR

REQUIRES DISCUSSION

this is the 'contains or references' idea

SPECPR-109

 Do not require the @internal@ ontology term descriptions and "name" on instances of internal types minorREQUIRES DISCUSSION
SPECPR-111 AUDIT_DETAILS.change_type needs to be empty in CONTRIBUTION.audit MinorREQUIRES DISCUSSION

SPECPR-114

 Use markdown for purpose, use, misuse, etc on archetypes MAJORREQUIRES DISCUSSION

SPECPR-115

 Specify ACCESS_ CONTROL_SETTINGS and a concrete subtype MinorREQUIRES DISCUSSION (Heath)

SPECPR-116

 Allow mapping to terminology for DV_Boolean MinorREQUIRES DISCUSSION (Ian M)

SPECPR-117

 Support newlines and formatted in DV_TEXT MAJOR

REQUIRES DISCUSSION (all)

This is the recurring issue of DV_TEXT formatting

SPECPR-118 Support Clinical Finding pattern in RM (negation / absence / presence)KAMAJOR

Help reduce unnecessary clutter and improve modelling

REQUIRES DISCUSSION

need something in RM? - Ian - create wiki page

SPECPR-119-(see SPECPR-41)   
  

Template Data Schema?

TDO

   

...